Farm Week: April 15-19, 2013

Work continued this week in the greenhouse, potting on more tomatoes and peppers, hardening off more greens, and giving our onions a haircut for better growth. We kept on with the transplanting, the tractor practice, and added a few new faces to the farm!

This week's adventure in tractors was the winning combination of bucket-loader and manure spreader, combining all kinds of hand-eye-foot coordination into one package. After a few minutes, I got the hang of the controls for the bucket loader, but I think I would have taken to it more easily if I had played more video games as a child! The scooping motion necessary to move compost from the pile to the back of the spreader takes some practice, and while it got easier by the second load, I was still being a little too timid. Plenty of time to practice! The manure spreader combines the specific skill of backing up and otherwise maneuvering a trailer with the PTO engagement that I learned for the spin spreader and the rototiller. Surprisingly, when I took the wheel to do a three-point turn with the trailer, I found that I had magically become better at it in the past two weeks of non-practice. It was like I had only remembered the skill and forgotten the other 50% of very frustrating non-sucesses. I think I'm going to like tractors.

As I alluded to above, we got some pigs this week! Two tiny little Red Wattles, which I helped named Biscuit and Gravy. They'll fatten up all summer on the farm's scraps and some feed, and then will take their place in the freezer! Right now, though, they're very cute, and the kids are having a great time taming them.

The other thing I have been reflecting on this week is how odd it is to be completely dependent on the radio for all of my news and weather on a daily basis. I've been an avid listener of NPR my whole life, and even had a few jazz radio shows during college. But usually, I've listened in the car or as podcasts while I do chores or run errands. The radio was always a supplement to other forms of media - I could look up the local weather report on the internet when I got up, and turn on the TV for a major news story. But my discovery this week is that when you don't have a TV, internet, or even cell service, you are subject to the schedule and the reporting whims of your local radio stations. I might turn on the radio to get a weather forecast and wait half an hour before I know how many layers to put on. This week especially, when I turned on the radio to non-stop news coverage of the events in Boston, I felt that I was always playing catch-up without the ability to pull up the whole story. It was an exercise in patience, and for the first time I really understand what it's like not to have total control over your information-gathering/media consumption. This week was a peek into that pre-TV, Rockwellian image of a family gathering around the radio for the latest news.

Thinking about: food forests, efficiency, warmer weather, pests large and small

Eating: italian sausage and borlotti beans, brown rice with yellow dal (lentils) and baingan bharta (eggplant); salami finocchiato on San Francisco sourdough

Reading: Mark Shepard's Restoration Agriculture, Jonathan Safron Foer's Eating Animals

Book Report: The Unsettling of America

IMG_0503.JPG

In The Unsettling of America: Culture and Agriculture, Wendell Berry strings together a series of essays touching on the state of the culture in 1977 as it related to agriculture, the environment, energy use, and even the human body. After hearing many farmers and other agriculturally-minded folks reference Wendell Berry as a major influence, I decided it was time to go back to the source and see what I could glean firsthand. Instead of going online and ordering a book from a major retailer, I just started keeping an eye out for Berry in the many used bookstores I seem incapable of avoiding. Finally, at The Dawn Treader in Ann Arbor, Michigan, they had one book in stock, and this was it. It seems people don't get rid of Berry very lightly. In looking at Berry's bibliography, I didn't exactly start at the beginning in terms of his agrarian writing. I approached the book, however, as a long, well-written postcard from the nascent sustainable farming movement as it was in 1977. Thirty-five years later, some chapters resonate more than ever, while some of his social philosophy is in need of a 21st Century update. Ignoring his diatribes about birth control and the importance of the marriage bed, I'd like to go into some of the things I found more relevant than ever.

First, his insistence on the need for good farming rings more true than ever. A few days ago, I posted this excerpt on Berry's ideal farm. My feeling upon reading that passage for the first time was "I couldn't have said it better myself." His insistence that the diversified farm is the healthiest farm is something that I feel is somewhat lacking in today's sustainable farming movement. To be fair, it seems extremely difficult to run a diversified farm profitably. For each enterprise to be big enough to make sense financially, a diversified farm requires more than one or two dedicated farmers. He further goes into the political and agro-academic pressure for farmers to "get big or get out" that has resulted in fewer and fewer farmers every year farming more and more land in monoculture systems. While the tide is starting to turn in some corners of agricultural academia, he makes the still-valid point that research and development in farm technology and farm machinery has so far been focusing on removing as many humans from farming as possible, ignoring almost entirely tools that would make farming on a smaller (human) scale easier for the modern farm family without mortgaging it to the hilt.

Another still-relevant point that Berry makes is the inescapable impact one's choices have on the earth:

"...no matter how general may be a person's attitude towards the world, his impact upon it must become tangible at some point. Sooner or later on his behalf - whether he approves or understands or not - a strip-miner's bulldozer tears into a mountainside, a stand of trees is clear-cut, a gully washes through a cornfield.
    The conservation movement has never resolved this dilemma. It has never faced it. Until very recently - until pollution and strip-mining became critical issues - conservationists divided the country into land they wished to preserve and enjoy (the wilderness areas) and that which they consigned to use by other people. With the increase of pollution and mining, their interest has become two-branched, to include, along with the pristine, the critically abused. At present the issue of use is still in its beginning.
    Because of this, the mentality of conservation is divided, and disaster is implicit in its division. It is divided between intentional protection of some places and some aspects of "the environment" and its inadvertent destruction of others. It is either vacation-oriented or crisis-oriented. For the most part, it is not yet sensitive to the impact of daily living upon the sources of daily life. The typical present-day conservationist will fight to preserve what he enjoys; he will fight whatever directly threatens his health; he will oppose any ecological violence large or dramatic enough to attract his attention. But he has not yet worried much about the impact of his own livelihood, habits, pleasures, or appetites. He has not, in short, addressed himself to the problem of use. He does not have a definition of his relationship to the world that is sufficiently elaborate and exact." (pp. 27-28)

In the 35 years since Berry characterized conversationists, some things has changed in the environmentalist movement: pollution and strip-mining continue to be problems, but global warming, fossil fuel dependency, and fracking have replaced them as the "large and dramatic" issues of the day. We have become more aware about the everyday "problem of use," but few of us have done much in the way of major change. Just as in 1977, there are select few of us living "off the grid," creating our own fuel and food. There is a certain portion of highly educated liberals who have made a series of small lifestyle changes: reusable bags, water bottles and coffee mugs; energy efficient light bulbs and appliances; hybrid cars; compost bins, rain barrels and even shares in a local CSA. But cumulatively, a small segment of Americans making small lifestyle changes doesn't add up to much progress toward the hyper-awareness of our relationship with the world that Berry idealizes. At the same time, I don't think this same segment of people is entirely ignorant of their impact on the earth. They are too comfortable in their "livelihood, habits, pleasures [and] appetites" to make any drastic changes, and so comfort themselves with these small changes, for which they are in turn rewarded with cultural capital from their own set. Right now, though, the vast majority of Americans live just as Berry describes us 35 years ago, without a thought for our very real and tangible impact on the earth. I certainly don't know how to change that, and people far more powerful than I have tried.

Overall, I enjoyed Berry's writing style, which made even the most dated portions of the book worth reading. If nothing else, this book provided me a peek into the state of the sustainable agriculture movement ten years before I was born, which adds just a tiny bit more context to every other book I've read on the subject. I'll be seeking more Berry out eventually, working my way through his vast bibliography of essays, books, poetry, and even fiction. The next time I need a literary lift after an agricultural clunker, I know what the antidote will be! In the meantime, I have quite a few books waiting for me on my shelf.

Read this if: you are a Berry completist; you are curious about the way the world looked in 1977; you need a little inspiration to be a better farmer or person in the world.

Farm Week: April 8-12, 2013

Week two started in sun (and sunburn!) before reverting back to a frigid rain, but not before we had time to plow and till a few fields! We direct-seeded our carrots and spring turnips, got the peas in the ground, and transplanted some head lettuce and brassicas: kale, chard, cabbage, and bak choi. The continued greenhouse work of seated seeding was contrasted with the very physical rumble of the tractors and the flexibility and agility demanded by efficient hand transplanting, leaving us very sore the next morning.

I started my tractor education this week! After some basic practice driving a tractor around and (attempting to) back up a trailer, I got in some practice on my first three implements: the spin spreader, the chisel plow, and the rototiller. Spreading a custom blend organic nutrients is the first step toward preparing a field for planting in the spring, and it is a low-stress, high-dust introduction to the tractor. After emptying eight fifty-pound bags of nutrients into the cone of the spreader, I donned my protective eyewear (sunglasses), facemask, and earmuffs and headed out to the field. Then off comes the spreader and on goes the chisel plow. A much more intuitive tool, the chisel plow is dragged through the field at a depth of about eighteen inches in order to aerate and loosen the soil without inverting the soil profile too much. This trip to the field involved a little more coordination; it took a few passes before I got the timing down to lower the plow right where the row started and lift right when it ended. A chisel plow also shows you how mistaken you were about driving in a straight line. The third and most complicated implement we tackled this week was the rototiller. Far from your garden variety walk-behind model, this rototiller is over five feet wide, and when dragged behind a tractor at the right speed with the right power will make a bed so smooth and fluffy you just want to lie right down in it yourself. Running the rototiller can be a slightly nerve-racking experience. For one, besides lowering and raising at exactly the right time, you also have to stay in as straight a line as possible while also lining up in a precise way with your last row so as not to leave any untilled spaces or create ridges by tilling too close. As if you weren't concentrating hard enough already, each and every rock you pass over with the machine makes a clank so big you're sure that this time you've broken the thing. I tilled and "punched out" (drove over to create a bed and a tire track/path) six beds, and the whole time my face was frozen in a look of "yikes that wasn't a straight line at all what was that sound I'm not very good at this at all did I just break this thing?" When I was done, it turns out that the beds didn't look so bad after all, and the good news is that I'll only get better with practice.

In other news, fellow apprentice Dan C. and I put in an order on Friday for twenty-five Freedom Ranger chicks to be delivered in the first week of May. We plan on raising them for meat, both for our own consumption and to sell to any CSA members that are interested. Mostly, we're doing it for the learning experience, and if the first batch goes well, we might scale up production for future batches through the rest of the season. So look out for future blog posts on baby chicks in the brooder, chicken tractors, and adventures in chicken slaughter!

Thinking about: horsepower, routines, reciprocation, projects

Eating: sweet potato and black bean tacos; pasta salad with green beans, olives, hard-boiled eggs, potatoes and dijon-mayo; roasted beets, potatoes, carrots, and onions over refried borlotti beans

Reading: Wendell Berry's The Unsettling of America: Culture & Agriculture, Augusten Burroughs' A Wolf at the Table, Mark Shepard's Restoration Agriculture

Wendell Berry on a healthy farm

"...One need not be a specialist to understand the difference between good and bad farming. There is nothing mysterious or abstruse about it. It only requires enough acquaintance with land and people to have some sense of what a prospering farm and a prospering farm community ought to look like and the same acquaintance with the signs of greed, hopelessness, neglect, and abandonment.
    The health of a farm is as apparent to the eye as the health of a person. To look at a farm in full health gives the same complex pleasure as looking at a fully healthy person  or animal. It will give the same impression of abounding life. What grows on it will be thriving. It will seem to belong where it is; the form of it will be a considerate response to the nature of its place; it will not have the look of an abstract idea of a farm imposed upon an area somewhere or other. It will look cared for - groomed, so to speak - like a healthy person or animal; it will look lived in by people who care where they live. It will show no gullies or galls or other signs of erosion. The waterways and field edges and areas around buildings will be grassed, something that becomes more necessary the steeper the ground is.
    The place will look well maintained. Buildings, fences, equipment, etc., will have been kept in good repair, carefully used, protected from the weather. ...
    A healthy farm will have trees on it - woodlands, where forest trees are native, but also fruit and nut trees, trees for shade and for windbreaks. Trees will be there for their usefulness: for food, lumber, fence posts, firewood, shade, and shelter. But they will also be there for comfort and pleasure, for the wildlife that they will harbor, and for their beauty. The woodlands bespeak the willingness to let live that keeps wildness flourishing in the settled place. A part of the health of a farm is the farmer;s wish to remain there. His long-term good intention toward the place is signified by the presence of trees. A family is married to a farm more by their planting and protecting of trees than by their memories or their knowledge, for the trees stand for their fidelity of kindness to what they do not know. The most revealing sign of ill health of industrial agriculture - its greed, its short-term ambitions - is its inclination to see trees as obstructions and to strip the land bare of them.
    Woodlands, orchards, and shade trees are part of the diversity of life that is another of the prime characteristics of a healthy farm. And this principle will extend to cropland and pasture. The aim of a healthy farm will be to produce as many kinds of plants and animals as it sensibly can. This will be an ordered diversity, the various species moving in rotation over the fields. The land will be fenced for livestock, and its aspect will change from field to field.
    Related to the principle of diversity is that of carrying capacity: the various crops and animals will be sensibly proportionate to one another; the farm will strive as far as possible toward the balance, the symmetry, of an ecological system; there will not be too much of anything. The fields will not be overcropped; the pastures will not be overgrazed. It will be understood that plants growing on a farm are not just its produce, but also its protection, and so a row crop will be followed by a cover crop, the cover crop by a sod of grass ad clover.
    And a healthy farm will not only have the right proportion of plants and animals; it will have the right proportion of people. There will not be so many as to impoverish themselves and the farm, but there will be enough to care for it fully ad properly without overwork. On a healthy farm there will be the right proportion between work and rest. ...
    Finally, a healthy farm will be so far as possible independent and self-sustaining. It is necessary to say "so far as possible," for we are by no means talking here about a "closed system." Simply by selling produce, a farm involves itself with other places both economically and biologically. And unless it encapsulates itself under a glass roof - which is really to become less independent - a farm cannot produce its own weather. Many farms cannot provide their own water. The wild plants, animals, birds, and insects upon which a farm's health depends will not respect its boundaries any more than the rain. And, of course, the people on a farm will belong complexly to a larger human community. Nevertheless, a certain kind and a certain measure of independence is a practicable ambition for a farm, and it is a necessity of agricultural health and longevity.
    For one thing, fertility, the major capital of any farm, can be largely renewed and maintained from sources on the farm itself - assuming that all else is in balance. By proper tillage, rotation, the use of legumes, and the return of manure and other organic wastes to the soil, the fields can be kept productive with minimal recourse to fertilizers from outside sources. If the organic or decayable wastes of the cities, which have their source on the farm, could be returned to the farm, that would greatly increase both the health of the land and the independence, if not of the individual farm, at least of agriculture.
    Equally important, by the use of good human power, animal power, solar, wind, and water power, methane gas, firewood from its own woodlands, etc., a farm can produce by far the major part of its own energy. This, of course, calls for a revitalization of local skills. But given the skills, these sources of power are possible. They come from the past and/or from new technology.
    As a farm measures up in these various ways to the standard of health, its troubles from pests and disease will radically diminish, and so consequently will its dependence on chemicals. A healthy farm will have no more need for these expensive remedies than a healthy person has for medicine.
    Health, then, does not "come from" independence or "lead to" it. Health is independence. The healthy farm sustains itself the same way a healthy tree does: by belonging where it is, by maintaining a proper relationship to the ground. It is by this standard of health or independence that one recognizes the absurdity of a farm absolutely dependent upon a complex of industrial corporations, which are in turn dependent upon the actions of foreign governments and politicians whom the farmer did not vote for or against and cannot influence.
    The ultimate good health of a farm is in its ability to produce independently of the ups and downs of the Dow Jones Industrial averages or the vagaries of politics... Those who pride themselves on the "science" that has made agriculture an industry have found this sort of independence beneath their notice. But I have watched, in Tuscany, a plowman driving a team of white cattle to a wooden plow, and realized that I was seeing the continuance of a motion and a way and a preoccupation begun before the rise of Rome. It is not nostalgia or sentimentality or wishful thinking to say that that man and his plow and team on the hand-built terrace under the olive trees represented a value, perhaps an immeasurable value, that modern agriculture has superceded but has by no means replaced."

Berry, Wendell. The Unsettling of America: Culture & Agriculture. 1977. Third printing, San Francisco, CA: Sierra Club Books, 1978. pp 181-184.

Farm Week: April 1-5, 2013

My 2013 farm season has started with a cold front of frigid nights and mornings, combatted with a never-ending rotation of layers and plenty of greenhouse work. The heated greenhouse is full of trays in all states of germination - the earliest of spring greens, plus onions and their relatives ready for transplanting, and tomatoes getting a hot head start. Outdoors, the winter rye is waking up on the untilled fields, the chickens are starting to lay more eggs, and the peepers are signaling spring by the end of the week.

The week was mostly an introduction to Chubby Bunny Farm, which is a fitting way to start the "Farm Week" series here on the blog. Chubby Bunny Farm is located in the small hamlet of Falls Village in far northwestern Connecticut. Dan and Tracy are in their twelfth year running the business, and their tenth year on this land. The farm sits in a valley on the south side of Canaan Mountain, with 12 out of 50 acres currently in production. This year, the farm will provide over 250 weekly CSA shares starting the first week of June and running through the end of October. Besides the 12 acres cultivated for row crops, the farm includes a 60' heated greenhouse for starting transplants, and 60' and 100' hoop houses for season extension and some heat-loving crops in season. While the vegetable operation is the bulk of the business, the farm also houses a small laying flock, a family cow, and a few feeder pigs each summer. The tilling and some cultivation is handled by a pair of tractors of about 50 horsepower each, but all of the seeding, transplanting, most cultivation, and harvesting is done by hand. This year, I am one of four full-season apprentices living and working on the farm; besides all of our hands-on learning opportunities, Dan is very open about the finances of the farm and the reasoning behind his farming decisions. We'll also be participating in the Western Connecticut CRAFT program, which includes visits to plenty of nearby farms.

I also spent the week getting situated in my new living arrangements! We apprentices are living for the season in decommissioned campers on the edge of the farm. We each have our own camper, complete with a little mini kitchen, and we share an outhouse, utility sink and an outdoor shower between us. We're constantly making little improvements, like constructing a covering over the sink, laying out a stone floor outside the tub, cutting a path to the neighboring stream, or digging a fire pit. Right now, we're relying on space heaters, sleeping bags, and layers for warmth, but as the weather warms up we'll eventually be grateful for our placement in the coolest part of the farm. We have mostly no cell service in the valley, and our internet is limited to the twice weekly overlap of hours of the local public library and our free time, so there will be plenty of time for reading, writing, and reflection.

Thinking about: flannel, thrift, imminent spring, leafy greens

Eating: fresh, delicious, rich eggs; spiced chickpeas and carrots with fresh ginger; seeded rye and gorgonzola cremificata

Reading: Wendell Berry's The Unsettling of America: Culture & Agriculture

Young farmers with an eye on the future

This is a long, meandering essay. Consider yourself forewarned.

Back in February at the MOSES conference, one topic that kept popping up in conversation after conversation was Climate Change. This is not exactly a surprising observation. Farming, after all, is one of the only remaining professions that is affected by the weather on a daily, weekly, monthly, and seasonal basis. By extension, the longer-term fluctuations in climate are of vital importance to the farmer dependent on the elements to make her living. When we hear about climate change in the news these days, it is often being blamed for the latest in extreme weather patterns - hurricanes seem to devastate more often, one hundred year floods return way ahead of schedule, record highs and lows seem to be broken every year. More often in recent years, we are beginning to hear about the effects of this extreme weather on farmers: a severe drought wiped out the corn crop in many areas of the Midwest, and brought record low yield in the rest; fruit growers in Michigan and the rest of the country lost all or most of their harvest in May when a late hard frost literally nipped apples, peaches, and cherries in the bud. All this to say that it's no surprise that when you gather three thousand farmers in one place, the issue of climate change is bound to come up. Young farmers in particular, however, seem to have a unique point of view when it comes to climate change. On the most basic level, it makes sense that those of us with the most seasons of farming ahead of us have the greatest stake in a changing planet. Those of us who are just starting out can (and must) plan on farming in a different world than we're learning to farm in now. For some, that means choosing to start farming in a cooler climate now, knowing that a few more decades might mean farming in a whole different zone. For others, that means finding dependable sources of fresh water, or avoiding areas where rising sea levels or more frequent hurricanes might wipe out a farm after years of hard work and investment. After a few of these conversations, I realized that we had started to sound like those "Doomsday preppers" you hear about sometimes - the ones that stock an underground bunker with weeks or months worth of canned food and fresh water, not to mention weapons, ammunition, and paranoia.

Now, in order to really get at the kernel at the center of each one of these conversations I had with other young farmers, I'm going to call on my not-quite-forgotten anthropology studies here and go out on a limb to make broad generalizations about "my generation." It is my opinion that my generation has a unique outlook on the future formed in large part by when we have reached certain key stages in the last two decades. At first, none of this may seem related, but I promise to eventually bring it back around to young farmers facing climate change. I don't know what my generation is technically called, but I'm counting people born between 1984 and 1992, roughly speaking today's "twenty-somethings." We came into consciousness after the Cold War, not old enough to learn to "duck and cover" in the event of a nuclear attack, never in our young lives taking on that fear that the world could end quite suddenly and without warning. Into this peaceful and sheltered existence instead crashed national and international calamities, just when the media three-ring circus really came into its own. Into the void apparently created by ceasing to worry about imminent nuclear holocaust slipped a national fascination with the gory, the titillating, the tragic the macabre: JonBenet, O.J., Diana, Lewinskey, even Oklahoma City. To my generation, the ubiquitious news stories were in the adult realm, cover stories to be passed over at the supermarket checkout counter in favor of the possibility of a candy treat.

The first national news story that affected our daily lives was most likely the shooting at Columbine in the spring of 1999. While we may not have been old enough to watch the news coverage, to the standard school fire and tornado drills was added a new maneuver: the armed intruder lock-down. Instead of lining up outside or crouching in the hallways away from windows, we were instructed to lock the classroom door, turn off the lights, close the blinds, and gather against the wall closest to the door, out of view of a passing armed psychopath. By 2001, we were old enough to watch non-stop coverage of our next national tragedy. To the armed intruder was added a distant, faceless enemy to fear. Over the next decade, first friends' older siblings and then our friends left to fight wars it was all too easy to ignore day by day, and which lagged on with no discernible progress or end in sight. Natural disasters occurred in such quick succession it seemed that the Red Cross might be running a Nigerian Prince scam on the entire country. The media circus intensified, with 24-hour news networks churning through the dark undercurrent of war, unrest, and uncertainty to draw the nation's attention to the same mix of the gory, titillating, tragic, macabre stories that characterized the 1990s at a dizzying rate.

We came of age politically in a time when campaigns started the day after elections, and when one month's sure winner was "who again?" the next. The first election we followed was decided by the Supreme Court, the next improbably bungled. We were forced to choose between a qualified woman and an inspiring Black man, and rallied behind the latter. We raised our hopes impossibly high, and had them chipped away by the incompetence and polarity of the legislative branch. As my generation started to become adults, to emerge into the "real world," the bottom fell out of the financial market and we were left to find our first post-college jobs in one of the worst job markets since the Great Depression. Into the churning mix of "news" is added the steady hum of foreclosures, bank failures, and monthly numbers of all kinds above and below projections for the the worst. In the midst of all of this, we became the most adept users of a tool that came of age as we did: the internet. We emerged into the world hyperconnected, with anything we could want at our fingertips and yet seemingly devoid of marketable skills.

This unique set of circumstances has resulted in a unique set of people, for better or worse. On the one hand, this melange of dark uncertainty has caused many of my generation to step back and view the world through a lens of detached irony: never caring about anything enough that we would be affected by its demise, eschewing earnestness, distracting ourselves by becoming briefly "into" certain things until enough people come to agree with us that it becomes "ruined." Others try to counter the uncertainty and hopelessness by diving deep into internet-fueled rabbit holes of pop culture, technology, fandom, etc., essentially replacing any emotional investment in the problems real world with emotional investment in a fantasy world. Some, faced with a world increasingly impossible to understand and problems seemingly impossible to solve, instead turn inward and magnify and sometimes exacerbate their own problems (see HBO's "Girls" for a pop culture depiction of this route). Others choose to tackle the world head on from both inside and outside of the system, protesting, occupying, and signing up for national service programs in record numbers. Still others react to the uncertainty of the future and the intangibility of a digital world by reaching into the past for analog skills. This is where the current crop of young farmers comes in: we are essentially taking this impulse to the extreme. What has manifested itself in a spate of "DIY" crafts, canning, and urban butchering classes becomes in us a need to grow food for ourselves and others.

So, bringing it back around finally to our young farmers talking about climate change, let's look at what we have learned to expect from the world in the last two decades. First, the gradual, cumulative changes brought about by advances in technology have created a world drastically different from the one we were born into. Second, drastic sudden events have created a world different from the one we came to know as children. Third, constant background chatter of uncertainty and certain doom courtesy of current events churned through the media makes the scandals and culture wars of the 1990s look like quaint bedtime stories. Given these factors, there is no reason for today's twenty-somethings to expect the world to be at all recognizable twenty years from now. There is no specific enemy to fear, there is no specific event to prepare for, but there is a certainty that something is in store for us that we cannot fathom at this moment. From this perspective, climate change is certainly something for the young farmer to consider in planning for the future, but only one worry among many. In a way, like those doomsday preppers mentioned above, we are arming ourselves for a coming apocalypse. Instead of stockpiling, however, we are choosing to equip ourselves with the skills to provide nourishment for ourselves and others. We are working outside an industrial food system that we don't necessarily expect to see in that unknown world twenty years from now. We are choosing a location to farm with the knowledge that it will be a different place in twenty years. We are looking to create local economies again, in which a community can provide for itself not only nutritionally, but culturally, artistically, spiritually, medically, etc. We cannot hope to affect much change in the wider world, so we try our hand at creating a world on a small scale that we hope will be thriving twenty years from now, no matter what the world looks like then. We are choosing to beat back the underlying doom with optimistic realism on a miniscule scale, day by day. We plant a seed optimistic that it will germinate, grow strong under our care, and that we will still be around when it eventually bears us fruit in return for our labors. As a young farmer, that optimism will carry me into an uncertain future prepared to handle whatever the world has in store.

On prophet-farmers

As part of my educational quest this past winter, I took advantage of a couple of classes offered by the Michael Field Agricultural Institute (MFAI) in East Troy, Wisconsin. The courses attract a wide range of people, including established commercial farmers, hobby farmers beginning to attempt serious farming, and young farmers just starting out. During a workshop on multi-species grazing, two young boys sat in the back of the room taking studious notes. From what I could tell, they were brothers, might have been home schooled, and may well have been involved in 4-H. Near the end of the workshop when the presenter opened up the floor for questions and discussion, the older of the two brothers contributed a series of questions and comments that all began with "According to Joel Salatin," or "Joel Salatin says that..." Without the book in front of him, this young man was quoting statistics like biblical passages. He had obviously done his homework, and that homework seemed to consist of taking the word of one man as The Right Way. While farming is certainly not the only realm given to demagoguery, there are certain strains of the sustainable farming movement that seem prone to follow the word of one man to what seems to me to be an extreme.

For those of you who might not know, Joel Salatin is the owner of Polyface Farms in Virginia, the author of many books on farming practices, and a well-known and oft-cited personality in the sustainable farming world. His most well-known and widely-embraced method seems to be the practice of "mob grazing," specifically grazing chickens under a structure known as a "chicken tractor." The basic idea is that by keeping the chickens contained in a certain area, and moving that area either once or twice per day, you reap the benefits of "free ranging" a chicken in that they forage and scratch for edibles besides the grain you feed them, but by containing them for a certain interval on the same piece of land, you force them to eat more that just their favorite morsels before moving on. Anyways, Salatin has written quite a few books detailing his methods for pastured poultry, produced an instructional DVD, and holds weekend-long workshops on his farm where you can pay thousands of dollars to see him move around his chickens in person. His method has certainly worked very well for him and made him a successful farmer and businessman, but he seems to have ascended to such a position that certain followers will hear no wrong. There comes a point where a novel and unorthodox approach becomes in itself an orthodoxy. Orthodoxy is not, shall we say, my bag.

Perhaps it's my Unitarian upbringing, or a habit I picked up in academic writing, but I tend to take what I can use from any source and discard the rest. There are some interesting and instructive stories in the Bible, but I don't feel the need to keep an eye out for the great Whore of Babylon. Similarly, there are some tips to glean from people like Joel Salatin, or from the writings of Rudolph Steiner. Just as I'm not going to swallow the Bible whole, I'm not prepared to pick a farmer-prophet and blindly follow him (and it's overwhelmingly him) to the ends of the earth. I guess what I'm trying to say is that I'm looking forward to continue my agricultural education in the piecemeal way I started, picking tips up where I can and creating a set of best practices uniquely tailored to my principles, my farm, and my soil. There is no one size fits all approach to sustainable farming, which is a significant part of what differentiates it from conventional farming. As Wendell Berry points out in The Unsettling of America, before the rise of large agribusiness in the mid-20th Century there was no orthodoxy in farming. Each region and to a certain extent each farm had its own set of best practices passed down through the generations. But with the rise of the paint by numbers chemical farming, there was suddenly a "right way" to farm advocated by suppliers, universities, and even the government. In my opinion, even though none of the several approaches to sustainable agriculture has the institutional backing that conventional farming enjoys, there is still the danger of creating certain orthodoxies within the movement that prevent farmers from tailoring their own best practices and maybe even leads to the high incidence of people who "burn out" of sustainable farming before they've really established themselves.

I've only read one of Salatin's books, and while I'm not exactly itching to add another Salatin opus to my ever-growing pile of reading material, I'm sure I'll get around to it one of these days. In the meantime, I'll keep reading whatever I can get my hands on. As I finishing digesting these books, I'll post a mini "book report" full of the methods and ideas that interested me most in each. Hopefully, it will be a helpful exercise, and not too completely boring to whoever decides to read my assorted brain-droppings.

Holistic financial planning

This past winter, besides my usual heavy dose of reading and movies, I spent plenty of time on the computer looking for ways to continue my agricultural education even in the off-season. While there is no real substitute for learning by doing, my natural bent is towards exhaustive research and planning. In my digital meanderings, I came across plenty of very helpful resources and eventually will take the time to share links to some of the site I have found most useful. It was through internet searches and reading blogs that I found out about MOSES, and about the Cornell Cooperative Extension. All land grant colleges have farm extensions, but Cornell's seems to excel in certain areas like sustainable farming and small farms. After reading through the different online courses Cornell offered through the winter, I decided that a course geared toward the economic side of farming might be the most helpful. After all, learning about financial planning on a computer is about as in the field as learning how to seed in a greenhouse! The course consisted of a weekly live webinar supplemented by readings and assignments for about seven weeks.

Holistic financial planning basically consists of financial planning with a view toward the "whole" person, household, or farm. Holistic financial planning for farmers consists of laying out your farm and family/personal values and goals, and make sure the way you run your farm business falls in line with those goals. For example, one might look at a budget and suggest lowering wages to the minimum wage to increase profits in a certain enterprise, but if one of the principles of the farm is to provide a good job for its employees, cutting the wage would not be an acceptable option. (The principles I outlined on the Farming Principles page are in fact the result of an exercise we did in the beginning of the course.) Included in these goals and principals is the quality of life that the farm as a business is expected to sustain. With an eye on these goals, you evaluate each individual enterprise on the farm and make sure they fall in line. For example, if you've always raised turkeys every fall, but they make very little net profit and you hate cleaning up after them, you might consider doing away with the turkey enterprise. If, however, you always have people asking for more chickens after you have sold out, you make a healthy profit on chickens, and you like taking care of them, you might look for ways to scale up your chicken enterprise to meet demand. On the more technical side, the course also went into how important it can be to really crunch your numbers as a farmer. After all, you don't know what your profits are for each enterprise if you don't keep track of your expenses. Enterprise budgets led me down another internet-fueled rabbit hole, further confirming my tendencies towards compulsive information-gathering (not bad, as far as compulsions go!).

Because I'm not currently running my own farm, the tools I learned in this course were mostly in the "file away for later" category. Additionally, I learned just as much valuable information from the other farmers in the course, who discussed the problems and solutions they had found in their own personal experiences. While I don't regret taking this course in the least, I'm not sure I would take another online course. I don't think the format is very conducive to my learning style, mostly because the slow pace of the webinars resulted in almost instant distraction. Since I was on my computer already, the ultimate distraction (interwebz!) was only a click away. Overall, however, I come away from the course a little more savvy in spreadsheets, a little more clear in my own goals, and a little more prepared for the task of running a profitable farm business, which is all I could have asked for (and more!).